Dynamic Microphones

Dynamic microphones are known for their ruggedness, durability and resistance to handling noise and feedback. This makes them ideal for capturing loud sounds, such as those of drums, guitar amplifiers and vocals in both recording applications and live performances.

Dynamic microphones use a diaphragm and coil of wire to convert sound waves into electrical signals. As they can withstand high volume levels without distorting the audio signal, dynamic mics are often used by musicians on stage or in studio settings where the sound is louder than usual.

Additionally, dynamic mics tend to be relatively inexpensive compared to other microphone types; this makes them an attractive option for budget-conscious users who still want quality recordings.

Advantages of Dynamic Microphones

Dynamic microphones are often preferred by many sound engineers and musicians due to their numerous advantages. One of the most important benefits is durability – dynamic mics tend to be much more rugged than condenser models, making them ideal for live performances and events that require a lot of movement or travel.

Additionally, dynamic mics are typically less expensive than condensers so they can be an economical choice for budget-minded consumers. Lastly, dynamic microphones have a lower sensitivity to background noise and feedback compared to condenser models which makes them perfect for loud environments with plenty of external noise.

Disadvantages of Dynamic Microphones

Dynamic microphones are not as precise and accurate as condenser microphones, and this can lead to a sound that is less natural than that produced by a condenser microphone. Additionally, dynamic mics do not pick up low frequencies as well as condenser microphones do.

This means they may be unable to accurately reproduce the bass notes in a recording or performance. As such, dynamic mics may require additional EQ adjustment in order to achieve an optimal output level with all frequencies present at their proper levels.

Condenser Microphones

Condenser microphones are highly sensitive and accurate, making them ideal for capturing delicate sounds. They have a faster response time than dynamic microphones and a wider frequency range, meaning they can capture more tones accurately.

This makes them an excellent choice for recording acoustic instruments, vocals, and other subtle sound sources which require precision. Condenser microphones are also often used in professional recording studios to achieve the best audio quality possible, as well as being popularly used in voiceover work due to their accuracy and sensitivity.

Advantages of Condenser Microphones

Condenser microphones have several advantages over dynamic microphones. Firstly, they are much more accurate than dynamic mics, making them the preferred option for recording music and capturing high-fidelity sound.

This accuracy results in a much more natural sound than one would get with a dynamic mic. Additionally, condenser microphones typically respond to higher frequencies than dynamic microphones which makes them suitable for recording instruments that produce higher notes or sounds such as cymbals and violins.

Furthermore, condensers are also highly sensitive compared to dynamics which means they can pick up audio signals from even noisy environments like live concerts or open air events without any distortion.

Disadvantages of Condenser Microphones

Cost – Condenser microphones can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars, depending on the model and brand. This makes them significantly more expensive than dynamic microphones, which usually cost less than $200.

Fragility – Condenser microphones are very delicate and require extra care when handling as they can be easily damaged by mishandling or shock. Unlike dynamic mics, condensers have a thin diaphragm that is highly sensitive to vibrations and shocks, so it’s best to handle them with extreme caution in order to avoid any costly repairs or replacements.

Polar Patterns

Dynamic microphones tend to have a more limited range when it comes to polar patterns, with cardioid and supercardioid being the most common. Cardioid polar pattern picks up sound from in front of the microphone as well as from the sides, but does not pick up any sound coming from behind.

On the other hand, condenser microphones offer a much wider range of available polar patterns including cardioid, omnidirectional and figure-eight. Cardioid condenser microphones are similar to dynamic mics; they pick up sound from in front of them and also from their sides only while rejecting any noise coming from behind.

Omnidirectional condensers can pick up sounds equally well no matter which direction they come in on all axes around the mic while figure-eight ones reject noises that come at them laterally by picking up signals both in front and back but rejecting those that hit its sides directly.

Frequency Response

Dynamic microphones tend to be less sensitive than condenser mics, and as a result their frequency response is typically more limited. While dynamic mics will generally pick up sound in the range of 50 Hz to 15 kHz, condenser mics are able to pick up sound in a much wider range including frequencies between 20 Hz and 20 kHz.

This greater sensitivity allows for better capturing of higher-end details like cymbal crashes or vocal harmonies. Condenser mics also have the capability of picking up lower frequencies that can’t be heard by the human ear, making them great for recording bass instruments or low-frequency sounds.


Sensitivity refers to the microphone’s capability of picking up quiet sounds; the higher the sensitivity, the better it is at picking up softer sounds.

Generally speaking, dynamic microphones have lower sensitivities than their condenser counterparts. This means that dynamic mics may not pick up very faint noises as easily as a condenser mic would.

Conversely, condenser microphones tend to be more sensitive than dynamics and can capture quieter audio with greater accuracy. As such, they are often preferred for studio recordings where capturing subtle nuances in sound is essential.


Dynamic microphones have a reputation for being able to pick up less background noise and other unwanted sounds than condenser microphones. This is because dynamic microphones are designed with an inner coil that moves mechanically in response to sound vibrations, which helps reduce the amount of noise it picks up.

On the other hand, condenser microphones rely on an electric charge created by two metal plates – one fixed, and one charged by the sound waves – to generate a signal. While this allows them to be more sensitive than dynamic mics and pick up quieter sounds, they may also pick up more background noise as well as other unwanted or undesired sounds due to their higher sensitivity levels.


Dynamic microphones are usually the more economical option when it comes to microphone purchases. This is because they generally require fewer components and are consequently less costly to manufacture than condenser models.

On the other hand, condenser microphones tend to be pricier due to their higher-quality materials and additional features such as built-in preamps and adjustable polar patterns. Furthermore, these mics often come with a shock mount or pop filter for improved performance and greater protection against sound pressure levels (SPLs).

Therefore, when deciding between dynamic vs. condenser microphones, cost is an important factor that should be taken into consideration.

Similar Posts